• Home
  • Magazine – Lifestyle mag
  • Magazine – Men’s magazine
  • Magazine – Fashion mag
  • Magazine – 27News
  • Magazine – Food blog
  • Magazine – Travel blog
  • Magazine – Video schannel
  • Magazine – Movie news
  • Magazine – Geek blog
  • Magazine – Business Week
  • Magazine – Smartness
  • Features
  • Category With Featured Area
  • Fullwidth Category
  • Post With Left Sidebar
  • Post With Right Sidebar
  • Post With Two Sidebars
  • Post Without Sidebar
  • Post With Image Before Perex
  • Post With Image After Perex
  • Review Post
  • Big Photo Slider
  • Squares Slider
  • Row Slider
  • Slider with Thumbnails
  • Special Slider
  • JaW Grid
  • JaW Mega Menu
  • Author Page
  • Videotutorials
  • Documentation
Log In

  • Home
  • Features
HomeUncategorizedThe seeming contradiction between warfare and morality has led to serious moral questions, which have been the subject of debate for thousands of years

The seeming contradiction between warfare and morality has led to serious moral questions, which have been the subject of debate for thousands of years

War can be seen as a growth of economic competition in a competitive international system. In this view wars begin as a pursuit of markets for natural resources and for wealth. While this theory has been applied to many conflicts, such counter arguments become less valid as the increasing mobility of capital and information level the distributions of wealth worldwide, or when considering that it is relative, not absolute, wealth differences that may fuel wars.

  • March 4, 2015
  • 3 comments
  • Jim McClain
  • Posted in Uncategorized
  • 0

There are two different aspects to ethics in war, according to the most prominent and influential thought on justice and war: the Just War Theory. First is jus ad bellum (literally translated as “right to war“), which dictates which unfriendly acts and circumstances justify a proper authority in declaring war on another nation. There are six main criteria for the declaration of a just war: first, any just war must be declared by a lawful authority; second, it must be a just and righteous cause, with sufficient gravity to merit large-scale violence; third, the just belligerent must have rightful intentions – namely, that they seek to advance good and curtail evil; fourth, a just belligerent must have a reasonable chance of success; fifth, the war must be a last resort; and sixth, the ends being sought must be proportional to means being used.

Once a just war has been declared, the second standard, or aspect, is put into effect. Jus in bello, which literally translates to “right in war”, are the ethical rules of conduct when conducting war. The two main principles in jus in bello are proportionality and discrimination. Proportionality regards how much force is necessary and morally appropriate to the ends being sought and the injustice suffered. The principle of discrimination determines who are the legitimate targets in a war, and specifically makes a separation between combatants, who it is permissible to kill, and non-combatants, who it is not. Failure to follow these rules can result in the loss of legitimacy for the just war belligerent, and so thereby forfeit the moral right and justice of their cause.

Related Posts

0 comments
Uncategorized

GDN Showcase: Uniqe Color Manager

0 comments
Uncategorized

Breathtaking Story Book Review

0 comments
Uncategorized

BeActive Headphones Review

Highlights from Spring Fashion Week

  • February 26, 2015
  • 0 comments

Sport Rock

  • March 5, 2015
  • 0 comments

Share this

0
SHARES
FacebookTwitterGooglePinterest
RedditTumblr

About author

Jim McClain
Developer

Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra.

Related Posts

0 comments
Uncategorized

GDN Showcase: Uniqe Color Manager

0 comments
Uncategorized

Breathtaking Story Book Review

0 comments
Uncategorized

BeActive Headphones Review

0 comments
Uncategorized

Review: WePlay Game System

Comments

  1. reply
    John McClain March 4, 2015 at 1:12 pm

    Many different types and sizes of horse were used in war, depending on the form of warfare. The type used varied with whether the horse was being ridden or driven, and whether they were being used for reconnaissance, cavalry charges, raiding, communication, or supply.

    • reply
      John McClain March 4, 2015 at 1:14 pm

      During the period when various Islamic empires controlled much of the Middle East as well as parts of West Africa and the Iberian peninsula, Muslim armies consisted mostly of cavalry, made up of fighters from various local groups, mercenaries and Turkoman tribesmen.

  2. reply
    John McClain March 4, 2015 at 1:13 pm

    Some of the earliest examples of horses being ridden in warfare were horse-mounted archers or spear-throwers, dating to the reigns of the Assyrian rulers Ashurnasirpal II and Shalmaneser III.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

The key to victory is discipline, and that means a well made bed. You will practice until you can make your bed in your sleep.
Copyright © 2016 Design by Jawtemplates.com. Disable responsivity

Magazine Wordpress Theme

BUY NOW

MAGAZINE HOMEPAGES